Herald checks the on-page signals that search systems and answer engines can read, then returns a score and the highest-priority fixes. Run the live 9-check audit first; paid help follows one clear ladder only when you need it.
No signup. See the score and top fixes before choosing free / 30 minutes → $47 → $297 → $497/month.
Run the Lead Leak Calculator → see how much revenue your site is silently losing every month.
Three steps. Start with evidence; pay only if a smaller next step will not solve it.
Submit a public homepage URL. The 9-check endpoint returns a score and prioritized findings without signup or payment.
Use a free 30-minute fit call, a $47 focused review, or the $297 baseline audit. The $497/month option is for ongoing support only.
The $297 audit is delivered within 48 hours or refunded in full. The scope, checkout, terms, and named operator are public before purchase.
Herald checks whether a public page exposes the structured signals answer engines can use. It does not promise a citation, ranking, traffic, or revenue result.
Illustrative readiness review — actual results come from the live audit.
It can verify page-level signals such as title metadata, heading structure, schema, FAQ structure, robots directives, and other public readiness indicators.
It cannot prove that a third-party engine will cite the page. The report separates verified page findings from recommendations so you can decide what is worth fixing.
Check my visibility →Start free. Move up only when the smaller step cannot solve the problem. These are the only four buyer paths presented on Nathan Management's main surfaces.
For owners who need help choosing the right next step.
A focused diagnostic when one clear next action is enough.
Prioritized search and answer-engine readiness findings for owners who need the full baseline.
Ongoing monitoring and implementation support after the baseline is clear.
A cautious buyer should be able to test the product, inspect the work, read the terms, identify the operator, and open a real checkout without taking our word for it.
Use the form above to receive a live score and top findings from the public endpoint.
Inspect representative report structure, scoring, and depth before choosing a paid audit.
Andrew James Flores is the named operator. The $297 delivery/refund promise is stated in the published terms.
Bring the site, the business goal, and the part that feels stuck. The first 30 minutes are free; paid work starts only after the scope and price are clear.
A focused conversation to decide whether the $47 review, $297 audit, $497/month engagement, or no paid work is sensible.
Use email when a calendar call is unnecessary.
Representative audit reports showing exactly what you receive — the format, the scoring, and the depth. Sample profiles are illustrative of real audit work; no slide decks, no fluff.
62/100C
Strong technical SEO, weak schema markup and answer-engine surface. Top fix: add `LegalService` schema.
View sample report →71/100B
Solid content depth; missing FAQ blocks and Recipe schema. Top recommendations: add both and measure the result.
View sample report →58/100D
Trust signals weak; no GBP integration on-site. Top fix: per-location pages with `MedicalClinic` schema.
View sample report →Title tag + meta description quality, H1/H2 structure, internal linking, schema markup (LocalBusiness, Product, FAQ, Article as relevant), Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, INP), mobile responsiveness, robots.txt + sitemap.xml correctness, answer-engine citation surface (FAQ blocks, Q&A pairs, llms.txt), Google Business Profile signals (NAP consistency, review velocity, category fit), HTTPS + security headers, alt text + image SEO, content depth + freshness, canonical + duplicate-content checks, and answer-engine optimization best-practices (for Anthropic, Perplexity, Google's answer overviews, and other answer engines).
Because the search landscape has shifted. Anthropic, Google's answer overviews, Perplexity, and other answer engines increasingly summarize choices before a visitor reaches a website. Most "SEO" audits still ignore citation-surface — the structured Q&A blocks and llms.txt files that make answer engines pick *your* business over a competitor. Herald scores both surfaces because both bring traffic.
48 hours from payment. If we miss that window, you get a full refund. Audits are delivered by Nathan Management with Andrew James Flores as lead auditor — that's how we ship in days, not weeks.
The published ladder is: a free 30-minute fit call, a $47 focused Local Visibility Review, a $297 AEO Baseline Audit delivered in 48 hours or refunded in full, and $497/month Managed Visibility + Automation for ongoing support.
Yes. Book the free 30-minute fit call. The purpose is to decide whether the $47 review, $297 audit, $497/month engagement, or no paid work is the sensible next step.
The page-level checks can be applied to most public business websites. Industry-specific legal, medical, financial, or platform-compliance advice is outside the audit scope.
For the $297 AEO Baseline Audit: if Nathan Management does not deliver the agreed audit within 48 hours of receiving payment and a usable public URL, the buyer is entitled to a full refund. Other services follow the terms shown at checkout or in the written scope. Read the published terms.
Andrew James Flores, Nathan Management — registered U.S. business (EIN 42-2084437). About page: nathanmanagement.pro. Email: contact@nathanmanagement.app. Phone: (951) 565-2593. We sign W-9 paperwork on request and remit any required 1099-NEC reporting.
For agency-volume or white-label questions, email contact@nathanmanagement.app. No public self-serve API is being promised on this page.
Run the live audit, inspect the samples, or use the free fit call before choosing $47, $297, or $497/month.